Authors:Christie Bahlai, Aleksandra Pawlik
Contributors: Jennifer Bryan, Alexander Duryee, Jeffrey Hollister, Daisie Huang, Owen Jones, and
Ben Marwick
Storing the data you're going to work with for your analyses in Excel
default file format (*.xls
or *.xlsx
- depending on the Excel
version) is a bad idea. Why?
Think about zipdisks. How many old theses in your lab are “backed up” and stored on zipdisks? Ever wanted to pull out the raw data from one of those? Exactly.
Other spreadsheet software may not be able to open files saved in a proprietary Excel format.
Different versions of Excel may handle data differently, leading to inconsistencies.
Finally, more journals and grant agencies are requiring you to deposit your data in a data repository, and most of them don't accept Excel format. It needs to be in one of the formats discussed here.
As an example, do you remember how we talked about how Excel stores dates earlier? Turns out there are multiple defaults for different versions of the software. And you can switch between them all willy-nilly. So, say you’re compiling Excel-stored data from multiple sources. There’s dates in each file- Excel interprets them as their own internally consistent serial numbers. When you combine the data, Excel will take the serial number from the place you’re importing it from, and interpret it using the rule set for the version of Excel you’re using. Essentially, you could be adding a huge error to your data, and it wouldn’t necessarily be flagged by any data cleaning methods if your ranges overlap.
Storing data in a universal, open, static format will help deal with this problem. Try tab-delimited or CSV (more common). CSV files are plain text files where the columns are separated by commas, hence 'comma separated variables' or CSV. The advantage of a CSV over an Excel/SPSS/etc. file is that we can open and read a CSV file using just about any software, including a simple text editor. Data in a CSV can also be easily imported into other formats and environments, such as SQLite and R. We're not tied to a certain version of a certain expensive program when we work with CSV, so it's a good format to work with for maximum portability and endurance. Most spreadsheet programs can save to delimited text formats like CSV easily, although they complain and make you feel like you’re doing something wrong along the way.
To save a file you have opened in Excel in *.csv
format:
*.csv
).An important note for backwards compatibility: you can open CSVs in Excel!
(or, how typewriters are ruining your work)
By default, most coding and statistical environments expect UNIX-style line endings (\n
) as representing line breaks. However, Windows uses an alternate line ending signifier (\r\n
) by default for legacy compatibility with Teletype-based systems. As such, when exporting to CSV using Excel, your data will look like this:
data1,data2\r\n1,2\r\n4,5\r\n…
which, upon passing into most environments (which split on \n
), will parse as:
data1
data2\r
1
2\r
...
thus causing terrible things to happen to your data. For example, 2\r
is not a valid integer, and thus will throw an error (if you’re lucky) when you attempt to operate on it in R or Python. Note that this happens on Excel for OSX as well as Windows, due to legacy Windows compatibility.
There are a handful of solutions for enforcing uniform UNIX-style line endings on your exported CSVs:
If you store your data file under version control (which you should be doing!) using Git, edit the .git/config
file in your repository to automatically translate \r\n
line endings into \n
.
Add the follwing to the file (see the detailed tutorial):
[filter "cr"]
clean = LC_CTYPE=C awk '{printf(\"%s\\n\", $0)}' | LC_CTYPE=C tr '\\r' '\\n'
smudge = tr '\\n' '\\r'`
and then create a file .gitattributes
that contains the line:
*.csv filter=cr
Use dos2unix (available on OSX, *nix, and Cygwin) on local files to standardize line endings.
xls
There are R packages that can read xls
files (as well as
Google spreadsheets). It is even possible to access different
worksheets in the xls
documents.
But
csv
with
additional complexity/dependencies in the data analysis R codecsv
(or similar) is not adequate?Previous: Basic quality control and data manipulation in spreadsheets. Next: Caveats of popular data and file formats.